Brolles R. & Straub B. & Maréchal T.Livre Rare Book
660 résultats
2023RO20260320Berger Levrault. 2023. In-8. Broché. Bon état, Couv. convenable, Dos satisfaisant, Intérieur frais. 1418 pages.. . . . Classification Dewey : 350-Administration publique
2024x-1636714994Code Fereral Regulations 2024. Paperback. New. 701 pages. 8.75x5.75x1.50 inches. Code Fereral Regulations paperback
2001Q-1560274883Aviation Supplies & Academics Inc 2001-12-01. Paperback. New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title! Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc paperback
2009Q-0160792045International Trade Administration 2009-01-02. Paperback. New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title! International Trade Administration paperback
2014100148718Brill Academic Pub 2014 618 pages 16 4x3 8x23 4cm. 2014. Relié. 618 pages.
2009Q-0160419360US National Aeronautics and Space Admin 2009-11-13. Hardcover. New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title! US National Aeronautics and Space Admin hardcover
2010032225Brooklyn New York: powerHouse Books 2010. ENGLISH language edition. Fine condition in a bright and shiny Fine dust jacket. NO chips tears creases or fading. NOT price clipped $24.95/ $28.95 Canada. We have only this one copy but it is available now and ready to ship today from Henderson Nevada. Sharp corners. NO owner's name or bookplate. Pages are fresh crisp clean and unmarked -- apparently seldom if ever read. Originally published in Japanese in 1965. This is the 2010 English Language edition. Translated into English by Miho Ayabe. Profusely photo illustrated in b/w and full color. Bound in the original orange pictorial boards stamped in white and black. From the publisher: "Described by The New York Times as a treasure of fashion insiders Take Ivy was originally published in Japan in 1965 setting off an explosion of American-influenced Ivy Style fashion among students in the trendy Ginza shopping district of Tokyo. The product of four sartorial style enthusiasts Take Ivy is a collection of candid photographs shot on the campuses of Americas elite Ivy League universities. The series focuses on men and their clothes perfectly encapsulating the unique academic fashion of the era. Whether lounging in the quad studying in the library riding bikes in class or at the boathouse the subjects of Take Ivy are impeccably and distinctively dressed in the finest American-made garments of the time. Take Ivy is now considered a definitive document of this particular style and rare original copies are highly sought after by trad devotees worldwide. A small-run reprint came out in Japan in 2006 and sold out almost immediately. Now for the first time ever powerHouse is reviving this classic tome with an all-new English translation. Ivy style has never been more popular in Japan or stateside proving its timeless and transcendent appeal. Take Ivy has survived the decades and is an essential object for anyone interested in the history or future of fashion." GoodReads rating: 4.19 stars. Hardcover. Fine condition/Fine dust jacket. Illus. by NOT a library discard. 141pp. Great Packaging Fast Shipping. powerHouse Books Hardcover
2005027833Las Vegas Nevada: Stephen's Press LLC 2005. INSCRIBED / SIGNED: "To Dwight Marshall Who has his own story to tell signed Jerry & Flossie." Dwight Marshall is Dean Emeritus UNLV School of Nursing . Near Fine condition in a Near Fine dust jacket only very lightly rubbed. NO chips tears fading or creases. NOT a library discard. NOT a remainder. Pages clean and unmarked. NO underlining. NO highlighting. NO margin notes. Sharp corners. Illustrated in the text and with 12 pages of photos on glossy stock. List of chapter notes. Postscript. Index. Bound in the original black boards stamped in bright white on the spine. Complete with full color pictorial dust jacket. INSCRIBED / SIGNED. First Edition. Hardcover. Near Fine condition/Near Fine dust jacket. Illus. by NOT a library discard. x 347pp. 12 pages of photos. Great Packaging Fast Shipping. Stephen's Press, LLC Hardcover
2023x-1644253585Aviation Supplies & Academics 2023. Paperback. New. 1064 pages. 10.50x8.25x2.25 inches. Aviation Supplies & Academics paperback
2008DADAX1619540215Aviation Supplies & Academics 2008-03-01. 2013. paperback. New. 8.50x1.63x10.75. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Aviation Supplies & Academics paperback
2011SKU0573382CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform 2011-11-01. paperback. Good. 8x1x11. Textbook May Have Highlights Notes and/or Underlining BOOK ONLY-NO ACCESS CODE NO CD Ships with Tracking CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform paperback
2008SKU0620876Aviation Supplies & Academics Inc 2008-03-01. paperback. New. 8x1x10. New Textbook Ships with Tracking Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc paperback
200514195Washington D.C. U.S.A.: United States Govt Printing Office 2005. Very large hardback in fine condition with fine dust jacket. Hardcover. Fine/Fine. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.: United States Govt Printing Office Hardcover
2012SONG1782660070www.Militarybookshop.Co.UK 2012-09-17. Revised 2012 ed. hardcover. Used: Good. 8.50x1.25x11.00. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. www.Militarybookshop.Co.UK hardcover
2001031122Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers 2001. This is the Test Bank to Accompany Principles of Macroeconomics Second Edition by N. Gregory Mankiw. It was prepared by L. Dwight Israelsen Bryce Kanago & Penny Kugler. Near Fine condition. Flat uncreased spine. NO chips tears creases or fading. NO owner's name or bookplate. NOT a library discard. NOT a remainder. A few item numbers are circled in the first four chapters only. All other pages are crisp clean and unmarked. Index. Bound in the original purple pictorial wraps. From the copyright page: "Portions of this work were published in previous editions." Oversize Softcover. 8.5" wide by 11" tall. This large heavy book may require SUBSTANTIAL extra postage for International shipments but only the standard charge for priority or media mail. First Printing of the First Edition Thus. Oversize Softcover. Near Fine condition. Illus. by NOT a library discard. viii 710pp. Great Packaging Fast Shipping. Harcourt College Publishers Paperback
200784040Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2007. Final Report--Presumed first edition first printing. Wraps. Very good. Format is approximately 8.5 inches by 11 inches. 272 pages. Illustrated front and back cover. Illustrations mostly in color. Definition of Terms. References. Appendices. Minor cover wear noted. NASA letter of appreciation to a senior National Nuclear Security Administration technical expert for support to this report. In the 2005 Budget Authorization Act the U.S. Congress directed the NASA Administrator to provide an analysis of alternatives to detect track catalogue and characterize potentially hazardous near-Earth objects NEO. Congress required that the Administrator submit a program by December 28 2006 to survey 90% of the potentially hazardous objects measuring at least 140 meters in diameter by the end of 2020. In addition the legislation required the Administrator to submit an analysis of alternatives that NASA could employ to divert an object on a likely collision course with Earth. A study team led by the Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation PA&E derived requirements and figures of merit from the Act and used these factors to evaluate the alternatives. The team developed a range of options from public and private sources and then analyzed their capabilities levels of performance life-cycle costs schedules and development and operations risks. This document presents the detailed results of these analyses. A summary report was submitted to Congress in December of 2006. During related Congressional testimony on this report it was stated that The report's basic conclusion is that ``NASA recommends that the program continue as currently planned and we will also take advantage of opportunities using potential dual-use telescopes and spacecraft--and partner with other agencies as feasible--to attempt to achieve the legislated goal within 15 years. However due to current budget constraints NASA cannot initiate a new program at this time.'' In addition the report contained a number of additional findings <br /> including: ``The goal of the Survey Program should be modified to detect track catalogue and characterize by the end of 2020 90 percent of all Potentially Hazardous Objects PHOs greater than 140m whose orbits pass within 0.05 AU of the Earth's orbit as opposed to surveying for all NEOs; The Agency could achieve the specified goal of surveying for 90 percent of the potentially hazardous NEOs by the end of 2020 by partnering with other government agencies on potential future optical ground-based observatories and building a dedicated NEO survey asset assuming the partners' potential ground assets come online by 2010 and 2014 and a dedicated asset by 2015; Together the two observatories potentially to be developed by other government agencies could complete 83 percent of the survey by 2020 if observing time at these observatories is shared with NASA's NEO Survey Program; New space-based infrared systems combined with ground-based assets could reduce the overall time to reach the 90 percent goal by at least three years. Space systems have additional benefits as well as costs and risks compared to ground-based alternatives; Radar systems cannot contribute to the search for potentially hazardous objects but may be used to rapidly refine tracking and to determine object sizes for a few NEOs of potentially high interest. Existing radar systems are currently oversubscribed by other missions. Determining a NEO's mass and orbit is required to determine whether it represents a potential threat and to provide required information for most alternatives to mitigate such a threat. Beyond these parameters characterization requirements and capabilities are tied directly to the mitigation strategy selected.''. National Aeronautics and Space Administration paperback
200986131Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2009. Presumed First Edition First printing. Comb binding. Very good. 31 3 pages including covers. Contents include Media Services Information; Quick Facts; NASA's Search for Habitable Planets; Scientific Goals and Objectives; Mission Overview; Spacecraft; Instrument - Photometer; Selecting the Kepler Star Field; Education and Public Outreach; Other Exoplanet Activities; Science Team; and Project Management. The Kepler space telescope is a disused space telescope launched by NASA in 2009 to discover Earth-sized planets orbiting other stars. Named after astronomer Johannes Kepler the spacecraft was launched into an Earth-trailing heliocentric orbit. The principal investigator was William J. Borucki. After nine and a half years of operation the telescope's reaction control system fuel was depleted and NASA announced its retirement on October 30 2018.<br /> Designed to survey a portion of Earth's region of the Milky Way to discover Earth-size exoplanets in or near habitable zones and estimate how many of the billions of stars in the Milky Way have such planets Kepler's sole scientific instrument is a photometer that continually monitored the brightness of approximately 150000 main sequence stars in a fixed field of view. These data were transmitted to Earth then analyzed to detect periodic dimming caused by exoplanets that cross in front of their host star. Only planets whose orbits are seen edge-on from Earth could be detected. Kepler observed 530506 stars and detected 2778 confirmed planets as of June 16 2023. By January 2015 Kepler and its follow-up observations had found 1013 confirmed exoplanets in about 440 star systems along with a further 3199 unconfirmed planet candidates. Four planets have been confirmed through Kepler's K2 mission. In November 2013 astronomers estimated based on Kepler space mission data that there could be as many as 40 billion rocky Earth-size exoplanets orbiting in the habitable zones of Sun-like stars and red dwarfs within the Milky Way. It is estimated that 11 billion of these planets may be orbiting Sun-like stars. The nearest such planet may be 3.7 parsecs 12 ly away according to the scientists. On January 6 2015 NASA announced the 1000th confirmed exoplanet discovered by the Kepler space telescope. Four of the newly confirmed exoplanets were found to orbit within habitable zones of their related stars: three of the four Kepler-438b Kepler-442b and Kepler-452b are almost Earth-size and likely rocky; the fourth Kepler-440b is a super-Earth. On May 10 2016 NASA verified 1284 new exoplanets found by Kepler the single largest finding of planets to date. Kepler data has also helped scientists observe and understand supernovae; measurements were collected every half-hour so the light curves were especially useful for studying these types of astronomical events. National Aeronautics and Space Administration unknown
201186130Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2011. Xerox-style reproduction. Assumed to be one of only a few produced for media representatives. Stapled at upper left corner. Very good. 63 1 pages. Illustrations. Mars Science Laboratory MSL is a robotic space probe mission to Mars launched by NASA on November 26 2011 which successfully landed Curiosity a Mars rover in Gale Crater on August 6 2012. The overall objectives include investigating Mars' habitability studying its climate and geology and collecting data for a human mission to Mars. The rover carries a variety of scientific instruments designed by an international team. Contents include Media Services Information; Quick Facts; Mars at a Glance: Mars Science Laboratory Investigations; Mission Overview; Comparing Two Mars Rover Projects; Spacecraft; Mars Science Laboratory Landing Site; Recent Current and Upcoming Missions; Mars Science: A Story of Changes; Historical Mars Missions; and Program/Project Management. For several reasons a different landing system was chosen for MSL compared to previous Mars landers and rovers. Curiosity was considered too heavy to use the airbag landing system as used on the Mars Pathfinder and Mars Exploration Rovers. The MSL engineers came up with a novel alternative solution: the sky crane. The sky crane system lowered the rover with a 25 ft tether to a soft landing—wheels down—on the surface of Mars. This system consists of a bridle lowering the rover on three nylon tethers and an electrical cable carrying information and power between the descent stage and rover. As the support and data cables unreeled the rover's six motorized wheels snapped into position. At roughly 25 ft below the descent stage the sky crane system slowed to a halt and the rover touched down. After the rover touched down it waited two seconds to confirm that it was on solid ground by detecting the weight on the wheels and fired several pyros small explosive devices activating cable cutters on the bridle and umbilical cords to free itself from the descent stage. The descent stage then flew away to a crash landing 2100 ft away. The sky crane concept had never been used in missions before. National Aeronautics and Space Administration unknown
200256499Washington DC: NASA 2002. very good CD-ROM's in fair to good plastic cases. 7 CD-ROM disks 7 CD-ROM disks in plastic cases--cases for disks 1 2 5 & 6 are cracked but no damage to CD-ROM's. The Nimbus 7 Limb Infrared Monitor of the Stratosphere LIMS radiance profile dataset of 1978/79 was reconditioned and reprocessed to Version 6 profiles of temperature and species that are improved significantly over those from Version 5. NASA unknown
200485216Washington DC: National Nuclear Security Administration c2004. Presumed First Edition First printing thus. DVD. Very Good/In plastic case. Face of the CD/DVD states: To open double cline the "My Computer" icon on the desktop double click Drive D: double click ;nnsa catalog". There are images of weapons and platforms and technology images. Additional text reads The Nation's Applied Technology Complex. National Security Solutions Provider. Many customers many capabilities one enterprise. The National Nuclear Security Administration issued this catalogue in 2003-2004 and an updated version in 2005 to present information that its Nuclear Security Enterprise provided complete integration of design development application testing and production and that it provided customers of the Nuclear Weapons Complex with access to unsurpassed expertise. Customers were assured that they would receive more than the highest quality product; they were assured of security and safety throughout the entire process--from design to manufacturing to final delivery. NNSA asserted that it was this complete suite of design manufacturing and testing technologies that made it unique. At the time it was encouraging DOD Intelligence Community agencies and others with appropriate requirements to explore working with the NNSA and its management and operating contractors. National Nuclear Security Administration unknown
201376279Las Vegas NV: National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office/National Security Technologies Office of Public Affairs 2013. Presumed First thus. DVD-RW. Very good. This has two files. One of JVE historic photographs as a powerpoint presentation with about 160 images. The second file is a WMV format and is about a 40 minute video of Ambassador Paul Robinson's remarks shown at the commemoration. The United States part of the Joint Verification Experiment carried out in 1988 as the Kearsarge event in Operation Touchstone. Twenty-five years later before tensions increased between Russia and the United States a joint commemoration of the event was held at the Nevada Nuclear Security Site formerly the Nevada Test Site. The objective of the JVE was to calibrate the seismic yield estimation capability of underground nuclear explosions conducted in both countries. It involved the unprecedented US yield measurement of a Soviet nuclear explosion at its then nuclear test site in Kazakhstan and the reciprocal Soviet yield measurement of a US nuclear explosion at the Nevada Test Site. JVE provided the first opportunity for scientists from US and Soviet nuclear weapons laboratories to meet and work cooperatively. At the Nevada Test Site and at the follow-on experiment at the Soviet Semipalatinsk Test Site they developed confidence-building steps that made possible the ratification of the TTBT in 1990. Both Russians and Americans agree that cooperation between US and Soviet nuclear weapons scientists began with the JVE and the follow-on discussions on the TTBT verification mechanisms during the Geneva negotiations. National Nuclear Security Administration, Nevada Field Office/National Security Technologies, Office of Public Affairs unknown
201180403Washington DC: National Nuclear Security Administration 2011. Presumed First thus. Held together with a binder clip. Very good. Volume 3 ONLY. C. Deeney's copy per cover sheet. While stated as Volume 3 this appears to be a stand-alone item documenting the Third Review Panel Meeting. It is labeled on the cover shee as NIC Preliminary Data. The agenda covers June 2 and June 3 2011. Among the topics and presentations at tabs are NIC Overview by E. Moses NIC Technical Framework by J. Lindl Ignition Tuning Experiments by N. Landen Progress on Target Layering by J. Atherton Implosion Experiments by J. Edwards and ITF/ITFX Assessment by J. Lindl and NIC FY11 Go-Forward Schedule by J. Atherton. The presentations are printed with four frames per page with substantial use of color. The National Ignition Facility NIF is a large laser-based inertial confinement fusion ICF research device located at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore California. NIF uses lasers to heat and compress a small amount of hydrogen fuel with the goal of inducing nuclear fusion reactions. NIF's mission is to achieve fusion ignition with high energy gain and to support nuclear weapon maintenance and design by studying the behavior of matter under the conditions found within nuclear weapons. NIF is the largest and most energetic ICF device built to date and the largest laser in the world. The National Ignition Campaign NIC was a multi-institution effort established under the National Nuclear Security Administration of DOE in 2005 prior to the completion of the National Ignition Facility NIF in 2009. The scope of the NIC was the planning and preparation for and the execution of the first 3 yr of ignition experiments through the end of September 2012 as well as the development fielding qualification and integration of the wide range of capabilities required for ignition. Besides the operation and optimization of the use of NIF these capabilities included over 50 optical x-ray and nuclear diagnostic systems target fabrication facilities experimental platforms and a wide range of NIF facility infrastructure. The goal of ignition experiments on the NIF is to achieve for the first time ignition and thermonuclear burn in the laboratory via inertial confinement fusion and to develop a platform for ignition and high energy density applications on the NIF. The goal of the NIC was to develop and integrate all of the capabilities required for a precision ignition campaign and if possible to demonstrate ignition and gain by the end of FY12. The goal of achieving ignition can be divided into three main challenges. The first challenge is defining specifications for the target laser and diagnostics with the understanding that not all ignition physics is fully understood and not all material properties are known. The second challenge is designing experiments to systematically remove these uncertainties. The third challenge is translating these experimental results into metrics designed to determine how well the experimental implosions have performed relative to expectations and requirements and to advance those metrics toward the conditions required for ignition. At project completion in 2009 NIF lacked almost all the diagnostics and infrastructure required for ignition experiments. About half of the 3 yr period covered in this review was taken up by the effort required to install and performance qualify the equipment and experimental platforms needed for ignition experiments. Ignition on the NIF is a grand challenge undertaking and the results presented here represent a snapshot in time on the path toward that goal. The path forward presented at the end of this review summarizes plans for the Ignition Campaign on the NIF which were adopted at the end of 2012 as well as some of the key results obtained since the end of the NIC. National Nuclear Security Administration unknown
200775574Los Alamos NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory 2007. Concurrence Draft. DVD. Very good. This disk includes the Summary Volume 1 chapters 1-11 Volume 2 Appendices A-M and Volume 3 Comment Response Document. The disk contains 2358 KB. NNSA proposes to continue operating Los Alamos National Laboratory LANL which is located in Los Alamos County in north-central New Mexico. NNSA has identified and assessed three alternatives for continued operation of LANL: 1 No Action 2 Reduced Operations and 3 Expanded Operations. The Expanded Operations Alternative includes the impacts of actions to implement the March 2005 Compliance Order on Consent Consent Order entered into by DOE the LANL management and operating contractor and the State of New Mexico to address the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination at LANL. NNSA intends to implement actions necessary to comply with the Consent Order regardless of whether it implements other actions analyzed as part of the Expanded Operations Alternative. Expanded Operations is NNSA's Preferred Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative NNSA would continue the historical mission support activities conducted at LANL at currently approved operational levels. Under the Reduced Operations Alternative NNSA would eliminate some activities and limit the operations of other activities. Under the Expanded Operations Alternative NNSA would operate LANL at the highest levels of activity currently foreseeable including full implementation of mission assignments. Under all of the alternatives the affected environment is primarily within 50 miles 80 kilometers of LANL. Analyses indicate little difference in the environmental impacts of the alternatives on many resource areas. The primary discriminators are public risk due to radiation exposure collective worker risk due to radiation exposure socioeconomic effects due to LANL employment changes electrical power and water demand waste management and transportation. Los Alamos National Laboratory unknown
201374122Washington DC: United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration 2013. Presumed First thus. Coin. Very good. The Joint Verification Experiments occurred in 1988. One occurred in the U.S. and one in Russia. A 25th anniversary commemoration was held at the National Nuclear Security Site formerly the Nevada Test Site in 2013. This coin was given out to a select few participants officials and organizers. Coin has a 1.5 inch diameter. On one side the center image is the Department of Energy logo with two outer rings with text. The outermost ring text is "Building Trust and Confidence National Nuclear Security Admiistration" The other side has a center image with the dates 1988-2013 Russian and U.S. flags and the atomic symbol and an outer ring with the following text "25th Aniversary U.S.-Russia Joint Verification Experiment". Agreement Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Conduct of a Joint Verification Experiment May 31 1988. Reaffirming the statement of the Secretary of State of the United States and the Foreign Minister of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics of December 9 1987 Proceeding from the agreement to conduct a joint Verification Experiment hereinafter referred to as JVE for the purpose of the elaboration of effective verification measures for the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of Underground Nuclear Weapon Tests hereinafter referred to as the 1974 Treaty on the Limitation of Underground Nuclear Weapon Tests the parties have agreed in part as follows: 1. For purposes of the JVE there shall be two nuclear explosions one at the U.S. Nevada Test Site and one at the USSR Semipalatinsk Test Site each hereinafter being referred to as a JVE explosion. 2. The planned yield of the JVE explosion at each test site shall be not less than 100 kilotons and shall approach 150 kilotons. 3. Each Party shall have the opportunity to measure on the basis of reciprocity the yield of the JVE explosion conducted at the other Party's test site using teleseismic methods and at the other's test site using hydrodynamic yield measurement methods. 4. Each Party shall also perform teleseismic measurements with its national seismic station network for both JVE explosions. To assist in teleseismic measurement the Parties shall exchange data on five nuclear explosions conducted after January 1 1978 but before January 1 1988 to include yield date and time geographic coordinates depth of burial and associated geological and geophysical data. For each of these historical explosions the Parties shall exchange teleseismic recordings taken at five designated stations on each side including station corrections and the best network seismic magnitude. 5. Each Party shall perform hydrodynamic yield measurements within the satellite hole provided for that purpose of the JVE explosions at both Parties' test sites using the methods it has identified in this Agreement. DONE at Moscow on May 31 1988 in two copies each in the English and Russian languages both texts being equally authentic. FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA George P. Shultz FOR THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS E. Shevardnadze. United States, Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration unknown
201773761Albuquerque NM: United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Defense Programs 2017. Presumed First Edition First printing if Issue B. Spiral bound. Very good. Various paginations approximately 150 pages. Illustrations. Some pages laminated. This Compilation includes Level 2 Federal Requirements Level 3 Contractor Agreements and Tools for Product Realization. The Defense Programs Business Process System DPBPS Portal as the mechanism for implementing DOE Order O 452.3 Management of the DOE Nuclear Weapons Complex. The Portal delivers business requirements and processes specific to the Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs DP for directing managing operating and executing programs at the nuclear weapons production facilities and laboratories within the Nuclear Security Enterprise NSE. The DPBPS shall be the official web-based repository housing the business requirements processes and tools to perform DP activities within the Enterprise. M&O Contractors develop Level 4 content to specify and further details needed for site compliance. b. Content posted in the DPBPS shall become contractually binding on the effective date informed through the Site Impact Analysis T014 process and authorized by the PADAMA. NNSA publishes the content after PADAMA authorization and before the effective date to allow contractors time to bring site-specific processes into compliance. The DPBPS' content apply to all federal organizations responsible for maintaining and enhancing the safety reliability and performance of the United States nuclear weapons stockpile including the ability to design produce and test in order to meet national security requirements. Field Office Contracting Officers are responsible for including this policy in the Managing & Operating M&O Contractor contracts for the National Security Enterprise sites. The Contractor Requirements Document CRD sets forth requirements of this directive that apply to contracts. The CRD must be included in contracts of National Security Enterprise M&O Contractor sites performing work under the Defense Programs. United States, Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Defense Programs unknown
