US Nuclear Regulatory Commission U SBiblio.com
335 résultats
1497307686.Gpaperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. paperback
1497373239.Gpaperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. paperback
CA08A-00130Academia Mexicana de Ingenieria. Collectible - Good. Mexico: Academia Mexicana de Ingenieria 1981. Sm 4to. 483pp. Spanish. Illus. figures charts. Limited edition #308/1000. Good book. Spine ends scuffed. Corners fanned. Top corner bumped. engineering nuclear energy books in Spanish Inquire if you need further information. Academia Mexicana de Ingenieria unknown
197917254Washington:U. S. Nuclean Regulatory Commission 1979. soft cover. Very Good/No jacket. Washington:U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1979. Lacks continuous pagination though complete. Softcover. Covers show some light wear to the edges and spine but otherwise only gently soiled and in very good condition. Interior is clean bright and free of stray markings save for a few pages with some pencil underlining. Overall a very good copy. Washington:U. S. Nuclean Regulatory Commission paperback
20022-0735400938Amer Inst of Physics 2002. Hardcover. New. 1st edition. 282 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.00 inches. Amer Inst of Physics hardcover
1782662499.Gpaperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. paperback
1958150624146Simmons-Boardman 1958-01-01. Paperback. Very Good. Simmons-Boardman paperback
DADAX041571396XRoutledge 2014-02-20. 1. paperback. New. 6.14x0.68x9.21. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Routledge paperback
19792606230018U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1979. First Edition. Paperback. Good. 0x0x0. Bound in publisher's wraps. Softcover. Good binding and cover. Clean unmarked pages. Minor shelf wear. Approximately 850 pages in various pagings : illustrations ; 28 cm. Investigative report no. 50-320/79-10 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission paperback
a82765Washington 1960 OAS. Octavo 369pp. illustrations wraps. VG. . paperback
a597101980. ISBN 92-64-12100-. 4to. 171pp. original printed wraps. Ex-university library with usual markings. Good large chip on rear wrap. paperback
a720491981 Office of the Nuclear Regulatory Commisssion. 4to. about 500pp. original printed wraps. A few ink numbers and Depository Library stamps. VG. Text clean binding secure almost no wear. backstrip faded. Scarce. . paperback
a1026751953 first edition. US Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests. DNA 6017F. 206p. 4to wraps. LIght non-circulating depository library stamps on cover no pocket no spine numbers no bookplate Text clean; VG. . paperback
a1026761953 first edition. US Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests. DNA 6018F. 230p. 4to wraps. LIght non-circulating depository library stamps on cover no pocket no spine numbers no bookplate Text clean; VG. . paperback
196161500N.p. New York: Carl C. Burns 1961. Offset broadside 11" x 8-1/2"; text printed in black on thin wove paper. Heavy stains verso bleeding through to recto conspicuous but not affecting legibility of text. Just Good. Dated at end of text August 1961.<br /> <br /> A resounding evangelical response to the threat of nuclear war published a few months after the Bay of Pigs Invasion during the build-up of Soviet nuclear defenses in Cuba. The author who signs himself "Carl C. Burns B.D. and Front Line Soldier" promises that New York City "will be in flames" and asks "not what but Who is your defense" Burns cites several lines of scripture to make clear his message that only God may be counted on to protect citizens from the flaming hell of nuclear war. Not separately catalogued in OCLC. We note one other copy recorded in commerce D. Anthem Bookseller Dec. 2021 but can find no contemporary references to the author whose hysteria no doubt spoke for millions. Carl C. Burns unknown
198234288Washington DC Defense Nuclear Agency 1982 paperback. United States Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests Nuclear Test Personnel Review. -- This report describes the activities of 1000 military and civilian personnel during 19 bomb tests 15 above ground at the Nevada Test Site in 1958. Radiation exposures are on tables and include also journalists and contractors. Map included. -- Softcover 240 pages 8.5x11inches. Condition: very good cover little soiled. Defense Nuclear Agency paperback
200582408Washington DC: Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures Program 2005. Presumed First Edition First printing. Wraps. Very good. 4 31 1 pages. Illustrations. Cover has slight wear and soiling. Executive Summary. Technology Summary. Supporting Information. A. Context for the Use of Radiation Injury Assessment Tools. B. Current Methods and Tools for Triage and Emergency Dose Assessment. Assessment of Emerging Dosimetry Technologies. References. Appendix A. Joint Interagency Working Group Participants. Appendix B. List of Abbreviations. Some bibliographic references cite the authors as: Turteltaub K W; Hartman-Siantar C; Easterly C; Blakely W. all of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. A Joint Interagency Working Group JIWG under the auspices of the Department of Homeland Security Office of Research and Development conducted a technology assessment of emergency radiological dose assessment capabilities as part of the overall need for rapid emergency medical response in the event of a radiological terrorist event in the United States. The goal of the evaluation is to identify gaps and recommend general research and development needs to better prepare the Country for mitigating the effects of such an event. Given the capabilities and roles for responding to a radiological event extend across many agencies a consensus of gaps and suggested development plans was a major goal of this evaluation and road-mapping effort. The working group consisted of experts representing the Departments of Homeland Security Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health Food and Drug Administration Department of Defense and the Department of Energy's National Laboratories see appendix A for participants. The specific goals of this Technology Assessment and Roadmap were to: 1 Describe the general context for deployment of emergency radiation dose assessment tools following terrorist use of a radiological or nuclear device; 2 Assess current and emerging dose assessment technologies; and 3 Put forward a consensus high-level technology roadmap for interagency research and development in this area. This report provides a summary of the consensus of needs gaps and recommendations for a research program in the area of radiation dosimetry for early response followed by a summary of the technologies available and on the near-term horizon. We then present a roadmap for a research program to bring present and emerging near-term technologies to bear on the gaps in radiation dose assessment and triage. Finally we present detailed supporting discussion on the nature of the threats we considered the status of technology today promising emerging technologies and references for further reading. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology, Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures Program paperback
199834542Fort Collins Colorado: Parkview Publishing Company 1998. First Edition. Hardcover. Very good. Quarto. x 325 pages. A few illustrations. Brown hardcover with title on the spine. Illustrated end sheets. Parkview Publishing Company hardcover
196411228Livermore CA: Lawrence Radiation Laboratory c. 1964. Presumed first iteration thus. Photograph. good. 1 photo color photo approx. 20" x 16" mounted on board 24" x 20" some soiling to board and some wear along edges. Peaceful nuclear explosions PNEs are nuclear explosions conducted for non-military purposes such as activities related to economic development including the creation of canals. During the 1960s and 1970s both the United States and the Soviet Union conducted a number of PNEs. Six of the explosions by the Soviet Union are considered to have been of an applied nature not just tests. Subsequently the United States and the Soviet Union halted their programs. Definitions and limits are covered in the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976. In the PNE Treaty the signatories agreed: not to carry out any individual nuclear explosions having a yield exceeding 150 kilotons; not to carry out any group explosion consisting of a number of individual explosions having an aggregate yield exceeding 1500 kilotons; and not to carry out any group explosion having an aggregate yield exceeding 150 kilotons unless the individual explosions in the group could be identified and measured by agreed verification procedures. The parties also reaffirmed their obligations to comply fully with the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963. The parties reserve the right to carry out nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes in the territory of another country if requested to do so but only in full compliance with the yield limitations and other provisions of the PNE Treaty and in accord with the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty of 1996 prohibits all nuclear explosions regardless of whether they are for peaceful purposes or not. Project Gasbuggy was an underground nuclear detonation carried out by the United States Atomic Energy Commission on December 10 1967 in rural northern New Mexico. It was part of Operation Plowshare a program designed to find peaceful uses for nuclear explosions. Gasbuggy was carried out by the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory and the El Paso Natural Gas Company with funding from the Atomic Energy Commission. Its purpose was to determine if nuclear explosions could be useful in fracturing rock formations for natural gas extraction. The site lying in the Carson National Forest is approximately 34 km 21 mi southwest of Dulce New Mexico and 87 km 54 mi east of Farmington and was chosen because natural gas deposits were known to be held in sandstone beneath Leandro Canyon. A 29 kt 120 TJ device was placed at a depth of 1288 m 4227 ft underground then the well was backfilled before the device was detonated; a crowd had gathered to watch the detonation from atop a nearby butte. The detonation took place after a couple of delays the last one caused by a breakdown of the explosive refrigeration system. The detonation produced a rubble chimney that was 24 m 80 ft wide and 102 m 335 ft high above the blast center. After an initial surface cleanup effort the site sat idle for over a decade. A later surface cleanup effort primarily tackled leftover toxic materials. In 1978 a marker monument was installed at the Surface Ground Zero SGZ point that provided basic explanation of the historic test. Below the main plaque lies another which indicates that no drilling or digging is allowed without government permission. The site is publicly accessible via the Carson National Forest F.S. 357 dirt road/Indian J10 that leads into the Carson National Forest. Following the Project Gasbuggy test two subsequent nuclear explosion fracturing experiments were conducted in western Colorado in an effort to refine the technique. They were Project Rulison in 1969 and Project Rio Blanco in 1973. In both cases the gas radioactivity was still seen as too high and in the last case the triple-blast rubble chimney structures disappointed the design engineers. Soon after that test the ~ 15-year Project Plowshare program funding dried up. These early fracturing tests were later superseded by hydraulic fracturing fracking technologies. Lawrence Radiation Laboratory unknown
197941748Washington DC: National Academy Press 1979. First Edition. First Printing. Wraps. good. 87 pages. wraps illus. figures tables footnotes references ink name on front cover covers somewhat worn and soiled. This is Supporting Paper No. 6 to the Study of Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems. National Academy Press paperback
199659760Washington DC: Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Task Team 1996. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket. 92 p. Includes: illustrations diagrams. Volume I ONLY. Prepared for The Department of Energy Office of Spent Fuel Management. During the six-month period from November 1995 through April 1996 the Task Team examined the wide-ranging technical issues attendant to achieving safe and cost-effective dispost of the aluminium-based spent nuclear fuel under DOE's jurisdiction. This fuel is from research and test reactors. This report offers a path forward. Volume I provides a technical synopsis of the fuel in question and the issues involved and summarized the Team's evaluations findings and recommendations to DOE. Volume II is a compendium of supporting technical information. Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Task Team paperback
200568273Washington DC: United States Department of Energy 2005. Presumed first edition/first printing. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket. Cover has slight wear and soiling. 91 1 p. Includes diagrams. Tables. Abbreviations and Acronyms. Recommendations. Appendices. The joint review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory cleanup program was conducted in early 2005. The team was staffed by members of the Office of Environmental Management and the National Nuclear Security Administration. The purpose of the review was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the scope of work for the LANL environmental cleanup program against the requirements of the New Mexico Environment Department NMED Consent Order the US Environment Protection Agency Federal Facility Compliance Act and other requirements. In particular the review evaluated the then currently planned scope as well as potential new scope to ensure it was well understood; that associated cost estimates and schedules were based on reasonable assumptions and approaches to work planning and execution and that the projects were being developed and managed in accordance with the requirements of DOE Order 413 for project management. United States Department of Energy paperback
200873622Washington DC: United States. Department of Defense 2008. 2008 Edition. Trade paperback. Very good. x 258 2 pages. Includes: illustrations index. Some illustrations in color. Glossary. Acronym List. Reference List. CD is NOT PRESENT. Nuclear weapons life extension and countering nuclear threats will continue to be a central concern for the United States and the Department of Defense. The Department has identified the dual missions of sustaining a safe secure and effective nuclear deterrent and countering the threat from nuclear terrorism and nuclear proliferation as among the most important for U.S. national security priorities. Nuclear Matters serves as the focal point for these missions within the Department of Defense. Since the early 1990s the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program has evolved significantly as a result of unilateral and bilateral arms reductions and the end of underground nuclear testing in the United States; successive editions of this work have been revised and restructured to reflect these changes. This book is intended to be an unofficial reference that explains the history and development of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program as well as the current activities associated with sustaining the U.S. nuclear deterrent. It is designed to be useful but it is neither authoritative nor directive. Please refer to the applicable statute regulation Department of Defense Direction/Instruction or Department of Energy Order for definitive guidance in all areas related to the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program. The content of Nuclear Matters: A Practical Guide is the sole responsibility of the Office of the Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Matters. This guide to Nuclear Matters can be read cover-to-cover for those who seek to understand the Program in its entirety and can also be used as a reference source to look up useful facts and information concerning specific areas. This guide is unofficial although every effort had been mad eto ensure that it is accurate and comprehensive. United States. Department of Defense paperback
199668604Washington DC: United States Department of Defense 1996. Presumed first edition/first printing thus. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket. Has slight wear and soiling. Tape bound. Various paginations approximately 125 pages. Figures. Acronyms. Chronology. The purpose of this Stockpile Management Information Handbook was to provide an overview of the Department of Defense DoD0 Acquisition Management System AMS; key organizations in that process; the joint nuclear weapons life cycle process between the DoD and the Department of Energy DOE; DOER organizations and production facilities; the documents used in the US nuclear weapons stockpile management process; and important events in the history of nuclear weapons. This handbook was intended to be both a training tool for persons without previous experience in the development acquisition and stockpile management of nuclear weapons as well as a reference book for persons on the job. This handbook was not intended to be a comprehensive reference source for program managers. United States Department of Defense paperback
199970684Washington DC: United States. Department of Defense 1999. First Edition stated. Presumed First Printing. Trade paperback. Very good. xviii 62 pages. Includes: Illustrations Diagrams. Acronyms and Abbreviations. Cover has slight wear and soiling. Nuclear weapons life extension and countering nuclear threats will continue to be a central concern for the United States and the Department of Defense. The Department has identified the dual missions of sustaining a safe secure and effective nuclear deterrent and countering the threat from nuclear terrorism and nuclear proliferation as among the most important for U.S. national security priorities. Nuclear Matters serves as the focal point for these missions within the Department of Defense. "To deter nuclear war and serve as last resort weapons of self-defense. In this sense U.S. nuclear weapons are fundamental to our nation's security and have historically provided a deterrent against aggression and security assurance to U.S. allies. A robust flexible and survivable U.S. nuclear arsenal underpins the U.S. ability to deploy conventional forces worldwide; provides the Commander-in-Chief with credible response options to strengthen deterrence; and supports U.S. nonproliferation goals by extending deterrence to allies thereby dissuading them from developing their own nuclear weapons." Secretary of Defense Mattis at his confirmation hearing January 2017 This was intended to be a basic reference on the nuclear hardening of military systems. This Guidebook was not intended to be a definitive document on the effects of nuclear weapons or a "how to" guide for Project Managers but rather it provides information to staff officers who require a basic understanding of nuclear hardening as it relates to the acquisition of nuclear survivable systems. The information is this Guidebook was current as of September 1999. Nuclear weapon system survivability is concerned with the ability of U.S. nuclear deterrent forces to survive against the entire threat spectrum that includes but is not limited to nuclear weapon effects. The vast range of potential threats include: · conventional and electronic weaponry; · nuclear biological and chemical weapons; · advanced technology weapons such as high-power microwaves and radio frequency weapons; · terrorism or sabotage; and · the initial effects of a nuclear detonation. Put simply nuclear weapon effects survivability refers to the ability of any and all personnel equipment and systems including but not limited to nuclear systems to survive nuclear weapon effects. Nuclear weapon system survivability refers to nuclear weapon systems being survivable against any threat including but not limited to the nuclear threat. Nuclear hardness describes the ability of a system to withstand the effects of a nuclear detonation and to avoid internal malfunction or performance degradation. Hardness measures the ability of a system's hardware to withstand physical effects such as overpressure peak velocities energy absorbed and electrical stress. This reduction in hardware vulnerability can be achieved through a variety of well-established design specifications or through the selection of well-built and well-engineered components. This appendix does not address residual nuclear weapon effects such as fallout nor does it discuss nuclear contamination survivability. United States. Department of Defense paperback
