83 résultats
2009LFA-126719588Revue trimestrielle fondée par Raymond Aron : 288 pages, format 185 x 255 mm, brochée, bon état
2009LFA-126719589Revue trimestrielle fondée par Raymond Aron : 280 pages, format 185 x 255 mm, brochée, bon état
2014LFA-126742570Une revue de 146 pages, format 185 x 240 mm, illustrée, brochée couverture couleurs, bon état
2014LFA-126742571Une revue de 146 pages, format 185 x 240 mm, illustrée, brochée couverture couleurs, bon état
2019LFA-126731879Revue de 36 pages, format 210 x 295 mm, illustrée, brochée couverture couleurs, bon état
20081348697PN. New. 2008. Soft Cover. This is a reprint edition. . PN paperback
20042-0735401772Springer Verlag 2004. Hardcover. New. 1st edition. 585 pages. 9.25x6.50x1.25 inches. Springer Verlag hardcover
20011336024PN. New. 2001. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition . PN paperback
2007R100060668Editions La Lenteur. 2007. In-8. Broché. Etat d'usage, 2ème plat abîmé, Dos satisfaisant, Papier jauni. 221 pages - tranches tâchées - petite déchirure sur le 2ème plat.. . . . Classification Dewey : 320-Science politique
201183117Editions Eyrolles Malicorne sur Sarthe, 72, Pays de la Loire, France 2011 Book condition, Etat : Bon broché, sous couverture imprimée éditeur noir et jaune, illustrée du sigle nucléaire grand In-8 1 vol. - 191 pages
201185257Editions Eyrolles Malicorne sur Sarthe, 72, Pays de la Loire, France 2011 Book condition, Etat : Bon broché, sous couverture imprimée éditeur noir et jaune, illustrée du sigle nucléaire grand In-8 1 vol. - 191 pages
2021LFA-126717388Un ouvrage de 208 pages, format 225 x 225 mm, illustré, broché couverture rempliée, publié en 2021, Editions Le Dauphiné Libéré, bon état
200223588Cambridge: MIT Press. Fine in Fine dust jacket. 2002. Hardcover. 0262025272 . Review copy with slip and publisher's promotional sheet laid in. First edition. Fine in a fine dust jacket. . MIT Press hardcover books
201273678Washington DC: Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future 2012. Presumed First Edition First printing. Wraps. Good. xxi1 158 pages. Illustrations color. Maps. Endnotes. Cover creased and has slight wear and soiling. Members of the commission included: Lee Hamilton Brent Scowcroft Albert Carnesdale Pete Domenici Susan Eisenhower Chuck Hagel and Ernest Moniz. A Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future was appointed by President Obama to look into future options for existing and future nuclear waste following the ending of work on the incomplete Yucca Mountain Repository. At present there are 70 nuclear power plant sites where 65000 tons of spent fuel is stored in the USA. Each year more than 2000 tons are added to this total. Nine states have "explicit moratoria on new nuclear power until a storage solution emerges". A deep geological repository seems to be the favored approach to storing nuclear waste. On January 26 2012 the Commission submitted its final report to Energy Secretary Steven Chu. The Commission put forth seven recommendations for developing a comprehensive strategy to pursue. A major recommendation was that "the United States should undertake an integrated nuclear waste management program that leads to the timely development of one or more permanent deep geological facilities for the safe disposal of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste". On January 26 2012 the Commission submitted its final report to Energy Secretary Steven Chu. In their final report the Commission put forth several recommendations for developing a comprehensive strategy to pursue. A major recommendation was that "the United States should undertake an integrated nuclear waste management program that leads to the timely development of one or more permanent deep geological facilities for the safe disposal of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste". There is an "international consensus on the advisability of storing nuclear waste in deep underground repositories" but no country in the world has yet opened such a site. In their final report the Commission put forth seven recommendations for developing a comprehensive strategy to pursue: Recommendation #1--The United States should undertake an integrated nuclear waste management program that leads to the timely development of one or more permanent deep geological facilities for the safe disposal of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste. Recommendation #2--A new single-purpose organization is needed to develop and implement a focused integrated program for the transportation storage and disposal of nuclear waste in the United States. Recommendation #3--Assured access to the balance in the Nuclear Waste Fund NWF and to the revenues generated by nuclear waste fee payments from utility ratepayers is absolutely essential and must be provided to the new nuclear waste management organization. Recommendation #4--A new approach is needed to site and develop nuclear waste facilities in the United States in the future. We believe that these processes are most likely to succeed if they are: · Adaptive-in the sense that process itself is flexible and produces decisions that are responsive to new information and new technical social or political developments. · Staged-in the sense that key decisions are revisited and modified as necessary along the way rather than being pre-determined in advance. · Consent-based-in the sense that affected communities have an opportunity to decide whether to accept facility siting decisions and retain significant local control. · Transparent-in the sense that all stakeholders have an opportunity to understand key decisions and engage in the process in a meaningful way. · Standards- and science-based-in the sense that the public can have confidence that all facilities meet rigorous objective and consistently-applied standards of safety and environmental protection. · Governed by partnership arrangements or legally-enforceable agreements with host states tribes and local communities. Recommendation #5--The current division of regulatory responsibilities for long-term repository performance between the NRC and the EPA is appropriate and should continue. The two agencies should develop new site-independent safety standards in a formally coordinated joint process that actively engages and solicits input from all the relevant constituencies. Recommendation #6--The roles responsibilities and authorities of local state and tribal governments with respect to facility siting and other aspects of nuclear waste disposal must be an element of the negotiation between the federal government and the other affected units of government in establishing a disposal facility. In addition to legally-binding agreements as discussed in Recommendation #4 all affected levels of government local state tribal etc. must have at a minimum a meaningful consultative role in all other important decisions. Additionally states and tribes should retain-or where appropriate be delegated-direct authority over aspects of regulation permitting and operations where oversight below the federal level can be exercised effectively and in a way that is helpful in protecting the interests and gaining the confidence of affected communities and citizens. Recommendation #7--The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board NWTRB should be retained as a valuable source of independent technical advice and review. Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future paperback
2001101251Atlantica , Atlantisciences Malicorne sur Sarthe, 72, Pays de la Loire, France 2001 Book condition, Etat : Bon broché, sous couverture imprimée éditeur blanche, illustrée d'une composition en couleurs In-8 1 vol. - 334 pages
2006RO40051371Revue d'études. Février 2006. In-8. Broché. Bon état, Couv. convenable, Dos satisfaisant, Intérieur frais. 45 pages.. . . . Classification Dewey : 539-Physique nucléaire
2009__0309130883National Academies Press 2009. Paperback. New. 168 pages. 8.75x6.00x0.50 inches. National Academies Press paperback
201267790Washington DC: The National Academies Press 2012. PResumed first edition/first printing. Trade paperback. Very good. xx 200 p. Illustrations. References. Title continues: Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board DIvision of Earth and Life Studies Board on Higher Education and Workforce Division on Policy and Global Affairs National Research Council of the National Academies. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration and other agencies. The growing use of nuclear medicine the potential expansion of nuclear power generation and the urgent needs to protect the nation against external nuclear threats to maintain our nuclear weapons stockpile and to manage the nuclear wastes generated in past decades require a substantial highly trained and exceptionally talented workforce. Assuring a Future U.S. -Based Nuclear and Radiochemistry Expertise examines supply and demand for expertise in nuclear chemistry nuclear science and radiochemistry in the United States and presents possible approaches for ensuring adequate availability of these skills including necessary science and technology training platforms. Considering a range of reasonable scenarios looking to the future none of these areas are likely to experience a decrease in demand for expertise. However many in the current workforce are approaching retirement age and the number of students opting for careers in nuclear and radiochemistry has decreased dramatically over the past few decades. In order to avoid a gap in these critical areas increases in student interest in these careers in the research and educational capacity of universities and colleges and sector specific on-the-job training will be needed. Concise recommendations are given for actions to avoid a shortage of nuclear chemistry nuclear scientists and radiochemists in the future. From Wikipedia: "The National Research Council NRC is the working arm of the United States National Academies which produces reports that shape policies inform public opinion and advance the pursuit of science engineering and medicine. The National Academies include: National Academy of Sciences NAS National Academy of Engineering NAE Institute of Medicine IOM Unlike the other three organizations of the National Academies the National Research Council is not a membership organization. The National Research Council was organized in 1916 in response to the increased need for scientific and technical services caused by World War I. On June 1 1917 the council convened a meeting of scientific representatives of the UK and France with interested parties from the US on the subject of submarine detection. The results obtained and the problems in the work were discussed. A further meeting with the British and French was held in Paris in October 1918 at which more details of their work was disclosed. As a result of this the council recommended that US scientists be brought together to work on the problems. A New York Group worked on "supersonics" as did a San Pedro Group. A New London Group worked on binaural receivers while Chicago and Wisconsin Groups were assigned various problems in support of the other groups. Due to the success of Council-directed research in producing a sound-based method of detecting submarines as well as other military innovations the NRC was retained at the end of the war though it was gradually decoupled from the military. The Research Council is currently administered jointly by the National Academy of Sciences the National Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine and its work is overseen by a Governing Board and an Executive Committee." The National Academies Press paperback
2003__0309087139Natl Academy Pr 2003. Paperback. New. 69 pages. 10.50x8.25x0.25 inches. Natl Academy Pr paperback
2013x-0309285321National Academies Press 2013. Paperback. New. 78 pages. 10.90x8.30x0.30 inches. National Academies Press paperback
201875549Oak Ridge TN: Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC 2018. Presumed First Edition First printing. Spiral bound. Very good. Various paginations approximately 320 pages. Illustrations in color. Compilation of briefing slides. Each briefing title slide has statement that the content is UNCLASSIFIED. The Y-12 National Security Complex is a United States Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration facility located in Oak Ridge Tennessee near the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It was built as part of the Manhattan Project for the purpose of enriching uranium for the first atomic bombs. It is considered the birthplace of the atomic bomb. In the years after World War II it has been operated as a manufacturing facility for nuclear weapons components and related defense purposes. Y-12 is managed and operated under contract by Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC CNS which is composed of member companies Bechtel National Inc. Leidos Inc. Orbital ATK Inc and SOC LLC with Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. as a teaming subcontractor. CNS also operates Pantex Plant in Texas. The briefings included are: Aging Asset Management Program Bill Tindal 6 p. Y-12 National Security Complex Site-Wide Overview Steve Laggis 20 p. Depleted Uranium and Fabrication Susan Baker 32 p Lithium & Special Materials Blake Scott 32 p Global Security and Strategic Partnerships Morris Hassler 17 p Safeguards & Security Program Tom Hayden and Melissa Blair 19 p. Excess Facility Disposition Diane McDaniel 21 p. Manufacturing Technical Support Johnafred Thomas 20 p. Development Randy Dziendziel 16 p. Assembly/Disassembly Operations Abe Mathews 19 p. Balance of Plant Scott Underwood 7 p. laid in Balance of Plant Emergency Services Robert Gee 16 p Material Acquisition and Control Ken Felker 9 p. Balance of Plant Administrative Facilities Durand Carmany 16 p. Balance of Plant Waste Management Tim Tharp 12 p. Balance of Plant Utilities Tim Hutson 16 p. Leases Transfers and Space Utilization Michelle Fine 10 p. Sustainability Michelle Fine 6 p. and Y-12 National Security Complex Program Review Steve Laggis 25 p. Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC unknown
201490908RBA Editions , Grandes Idées de la Science Malicorne sur Sarthe, 72, Pays de la Loire, France 2014 Book condition, Etat : Très Bon relié, cartonnage imprimé éditeur noir, illustré d'une figure en couleurs grand In-8 1 vol. - 151 pages
2013x-1442225114Center for Strategic & Intl studies 2013. Paperback. New. 86 pages. 11.25x8.75x0.25 inches. Center for Strategic & Intl studies paperback
20041342809PN. New. 2004. Soft Cover. md . PN paperback
201490108Editions L'Echappée , Pour en Finir Avec Malicorne sur Sarthe, 72, Pays de la Loire, France 2014 Book condition, Etat : Très Bon broché, sous couverture imprimée à rabats éditeur vert foncé, illustrée d'une tête de mort vert clair In-8 1 vol. - 294 pages
