335 résultats
20301648-nnew. unknown
20301649-nnew. unknown
20301648like new. unknown
20301649like new. unknown
0415713935New. Brand new and still unused unknown
DADAX0415713935Routledge 2014-02-26. 1. hardcover. New. 6.50x1.00x9.50. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Routledge hardcover
DADAX041571396XRoutledge 2014-02-20. 1. paperback. New. 6.14x0.68x9.21. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Routledge paperback
2014x-041571396XRoutledge 2014. Paperback. New. 248 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. Routledge paperback
2014x-0415713935Routledge 2014. Hardcover. New. 288 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.00 inches. Routledge hardcover
ria9780415713962_inpPaperback. New. New Book; Fast Shipping from UK; Not signed; Not First Edition; Following the disaster at the the public is showing increased interest in nuclear safety. This important book is based on an independent report on the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disater in Japan in March 2011. The over paperback
ria9780415713931_inpHardcover. New. New Book; Fast Shipping from UK; Not signed; Not First Edition; Following the disaster at the the public is showing increased interest in nuclear safety. This important book is based on an independent report on the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disater in Japan in March 2011. The over hardcover
A9780415713931Hardback. New. hardcover
1985mon0003599644Univ of Tokyo Pr 1985-09-01. Hardcover. Good. . Univ of Tokyo Pr hardcover
197987716Washington DC: Defense Nuclear Agency 1979. Preliminary Draft. Comb binding. Fair. iii 60 pages some pages have multiple page numbers used with designation of "a" 'b' etc. These added pages appear to be solely used for illustrations. Pages printed on one side only. Cover has some wear and soiling. There is a blank page between pages 21 and 22. Illustrations/figures/tables. Maps. Tabular data. Ink notation at bottom of front cover. Pencil correction on page iii. replacing 'demolition' with 'detonation'. Pencil notations on pages 14 17 18 46 and 59. There appear to have been no pages 15 and 16 as the text flows seamlessly from page 14 to page 17. The text moves from page 32 through 32a to 33 b. There is a gap before page 34 indicating a missing page 33 and illustration 33a. It is not unusual for there to be areas where the document appears incomplete as this is stated as a preliminary draft and it is possible some text and illustration were removed pending resolution of potential concerns regarding information classification. The Department of Defense led the radiological cleanup of Enewetak Atoll in the Marshall Islands. The combined federal effort cost about $100 million and required an on-atoll task force numbering almost 1000 people for three years 1977-1980. The departments of Defense Energy and Interior were involved in this project. The DOD organized three separate efforts in support of the cleanup: Removal and lagoon-dumping of uncontaminated debris and structures removal and crater-entombment of radiological contaminated debris and structures and excision and crater-entombment of radiological contaminated soil from the islands. This document is not listed/identified on the ENEWETAK ATOLL CLEANUP DOCUMENTS web page which is an official U.S. Government web page supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. This chapter discusses Operation Sandstone Rehabilitation and Construction Activities Operation Greenhouse Operation Ivy Operation Castle Operation Redwing Operation Hardtack Moratorium and provides a Summary of Test Effects. There is a discussion of the Effects of Test Program on 26 individual islands. There is a discussion of the effect of Atoll experience on cleanup. and the final portion addresses Enewetak Interim 1958-1972 and Projects Hues Pace and Expo. An example of the information content is from pages 31 and 32: "Fallout from 16 events caused Eleleron to be ranked second of all islands of the atoll in H-1 hour exposure having accumulated 10643 R/hr. Most of the land mass receiving this exposure has been blasted or eroded away. Soil sampling showed surface activity to be relatively low and the one profile sample displayed a homogeneous distribution with depth this being considered to be the result of hydraulic influences." Defense Nuclear Agency unknown
1957106646<p>Large 8vo softcover illustrated 579 pp. Lower spine and bottom front cover chipped and missing a small portion paper fragile some aging; otherwise fair to good condition. Published by the government and edited by Samuel Glasstone this work tells the reader everything they need to know about nuclear weapons. Illustrated with photographs and charts to make sure you get the picture.</p> United States Atomic Energy Commission.
1985DBS-9780309035286National Academy 1985. 1. Paperback. New. National Academy paperback
1985DBS-9780309035286National Academy 1985. 1. Paperback. New. National Academy paperback
198565889Washington DC: National Academies Press 1985. Presumed first edition/first printing. Trade paperback. Good. No dust jacket as issued. Ex-library. Usual library markings. COver has some wear and soiling. ix 1 . 193 1 p. References. Diagrams. Maps. Illustrations. Index. Most of the earth's population would survive the immediate horrors of a nuclear holocaust but what long-term climatological changes would affect their ability to secure food and shelter This sobering book considers the effects of fine dust from ground-level detonations of smoke from widespread fires and of chemicals released into the atmosphere. The authors use mathematical models of atmospheric processes and data from natural situations-e.g. volcanic eruptions and arctic haze-to draw their conclusions. This is the most detailed and comprehensive probe of the scientific evidence published to date. National Academies Press paperback
647994438National Academy Press pp. 193 . Papeback. Used. National Academy Press unknown
192146992London Taylor and Francis 1921. Blank wrapper. In: "The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science" Sixth Series Vol.42 No. 252 December 1921. Pp. 873-1024 textillustr. a. 1 plate. Entire issue offered. Chadwick & Bieler's paper: pp. 923-940 textillustr. <br/><br/><em>First printingof this milestone paper in which the strong nuclear forces are mentioned for the first time."It was only in 1921 that Chadwick had first shown that at very small distances the interactions of alpha particles with the atomic nucleus did not follow exactly the inverse square law predicted from the repulsion of their positive electrical scharges. Chadwick concluded that his experiments showed that these nuclear forces are of "very great intensity". According to Pais this is THE FIRST PUBLISHED STATEMENT ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF A STRONG NUCLEAR FORCE. This 'new force' interpretation was disputed untill well into 1920s."Hey & Walters."In any event Chadwick and Bieler's final conclusion avoid all reference to a possible electromagnetic cause for the deviations from the simple theory: "The present experiments do not seem to throw any light on the nature of the law of variation of the forces at the seat of an electric charge but merely show that the forces are of very great intensity. It is our task to find some field of force which will reproduce these effects." I consider this statement made in 1921 as marking the birth of the strong interaction."Pais in "Inward Bound" p. 240. </em> unknown
200582408Washington DC: Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures Program 2005. Presumed First Edition First printing. Wraps. Very good. 4 31 1 pages. Illustrations. Cover has slight wear and soiling. Executive Summary. Technology Summary. Supporting Information. A. Context for the Use of Radiation Injury Assessment Tools. B. Current Methods and Tools for Triage and Emergency Dose Assessment. Assessment of Emerging Dosimetry Technologies. References. Appendix A. Joint Interagency Working Group Participants. Appendix B. List of Abbreviations. Some bibliographic references cite the authors as: Turteltaub K W; Hartman-Siantar C; Easterly C; Blakely W. all of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. A Joint Interagency Working Group JIWG under the auspices of the Department of Homeland Security Office of Research and Development conducted a technology assessment of emergency radiological dose assessment capabilities as part of the overall need for rapid emergency medical response in the event of a radiological terrorist event in the United States. The goal of the evaluation is to identify gaps and recommend general research and development needs to better prepare the Country for mitigating the effects of such an event. Given the capabilities and roles for responding to a radiological event extend across many agencies a consensus of gaps and suggested development plans was a major goal of this evaluation and road-mapping effort. The working group consisted of experts representing the Departments of Homeland Security Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health Food and Drug Administration Department of Defense and the Department of Energy's National Laboratories see appendix A for participants. The specific goals of this Technology Assessment and Roadmap were to: 1 Describe the general context for deployment of emergency radiation dose assessment tools following terrorist use of a radiological or nuclear device; 2 Assess current and emerging dose assessment technologies; and 3 Put forward a consensus high-level technology roadmap for interagency research and development in this area. This report provides a summary of the consensus of needs gaps and recommendations for a research program in the area of radiation dosimetry for early response followed by a summary of the technologies available and on the near-term horizon. We then present a roadmap for a research program to bring present and emerging near-term technologies to bear on the gaps in radiation dose assessment and triage. Finally we present detailed supporting discussion on the nature of the threats we considered the status of technology today promising emerging technologies and references for further reading. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology, Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures Program paperback
1987778891PN. New. 1987. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition. . PN paperback
199774858Washington DC: Nuclear Energy Institute 1997. Xerox-type of agenda and presentation vugraphs. Binderclipped loose pages. Fair. Unpaginated approximately 150 pages. Very scarce surviving meeting materials. Some pages of inferior copy quality but are quite readable. This meeting was held near the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and was foundational to the U.S. MOX decisions. This package of materials includes a copy of the agenda and copies of each presentation listed on the agenda. These are: Site Infrastructure & Building Feasibility Review for a MOX Fabrication Facility by Damian Peko Office of Fissile Materials Disposition U. S. Department of Energy; BNFL MOX Fabrication and Licensing Experience by Bryen Martin BNFL; Belgonucleaire MOX Fabrication and Licensing Experience by Michel Debauche Manager MOX Plant Engineering Belgonucleaire; COGEMA Inc. MOX Fabrication and Licensing Experience by Gerard Lebastard Director International Business COGEMA and Siemens Power Corp. MOX Fabrication and Licensing Experience by Carl A. Duckwitz Consultant. Marvin Fertel Vice President Suppliers International and Fuels Nuclear Energy Institute welcomed the attendees at the start and summarized the discussion at the end no vugraphs associated with his remarks. The U.S. Department of Energy DOE signed a contract with Duke COGEMA Stone & Webster DCS now called Shaw AREVA MOX Services MOX Services or the applicant to design build and operate a Mixed Oxide MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility MFFF. On February 28 2001 the applicant submitted a request to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC to construct a MFFF on the DOE's Savannah River Site SRS near Aiken South Carolina. On March 30 2005 the Commission issued the construction authorization CA. Two years after the CA was issued the construction started. In 2006 MOX Services submitted a license application to possess and use byproduct and special nuclear material SNM at the MFFF. When the facility is authorized to use and possess SNM it will take surplus weapon-grade plutonium remove impurities and mix it with uranium oxide to form MOX fuel pellets for reactor fuel assemblies. These assemblies will be irradiated in commercial nuclear power reactors. Following irradiation the resulting spent fuel would contain plutonium in a form less usable for nuclear weapons. Nuclear Energy Institute unknown
199659760Washington DC: Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Task Team 1996. Wraps. Very good. No dust jacket. 92 p. Includes: illustrations diagrams. Volume I ONLY. Prepared for The Department of Energy Office of Spent Fuel Management. During the six-month period from November 1995 through April 1996 the Task Team examined the wide-ranging technical issues attendant to achieving safe and cost-effective dispost of the aluminium-based spent nuclear fuel under DOE's jurisdiction. This fuel is from research and test reactors. This report offers a path forward. Volume I provides a technical synopsis of the fuel in question and the issues involved and summarized the Team's evaluations findings and recommendations to DOE. Volume II is a compendium of supporting technical information. Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Task Team paperback
B9781497373235Paperback / softback. New. paperback
