335 résultats
20042-0735401772Springer Verlag 2004. Hardcover. New. 1st edition. 585 pages. 9.25x6.50x1.25 inches. Springer Verlag hardcover
20011336024PN. New. 2001. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition . PN paperback
1997298128PN. New. 1997. . Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition . PN paperback
1997298127PN. New. 1997. . Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition . PN paperback
1993269407PN. New. 1993. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition . PN paperback
1853331090.Ghardcover. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. hardcover
1988DADAX1853331090Springer 1988-03-31. 1988. hardcover. New. 6.26x0.55x9.70. Buy with confidence. Excellent Customer Service & Return policy. Springer hardcover
1988ZB867349Intl Atomic Energy Agency 1988. 479 pp. Paperback ex library else text clean and binding tight. - If you are reading this this item is actually physically in our stock and ready for shipment once ordered. We are not bookjackers. Buyer is responsible for any additional duties taxes or fees required by recipient's country. Intl Atomic Energy Agency paperback
36862-A-65758A.W. Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory/Yale University New Haven 1987. The first volume from the August 7 1987 has a signed dedication in ink from D. Allan Bromley to Rolf Siemssen. The Symposium was published on August 7. Both paperbacks with many ills in black and white. -good.-The spines are sunned signs of use on the covers but overall the books are in good condition. A.W. Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory/Yale University, New Haven, 1987 paperback
ria9780323904544_inpPaperback / softback. New. New Book; Fast Shipping from UK; Not signed; Not First Edition; N/A paperback
201273678Washington DC: Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future 2012. Presumed First Edition First printing. Wraps. Good. xxi1 158 pages. Illustrations color. Maps. Endnotes. Cover creased and has slight wear and soiling. Members of the commission included: Lee Hamilton Brent Scowcroft Albert Carnesdale Pete Domenici Susan Eisenhower Chuck Hagel and Ernest Moniz. A Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future was appointed by President Obama to look into future options for existing and future nuclear waste following the ending of work on the incomplete Yucca Mountain Repository. At present there are 70 nuclear power plant sites where 65000 tons of spent fuel is stored in the USA. Each year more than 2000 tons are added to this total. Nine states have "explicit moratoria on new nuclear power until a storage solution emerges". A deep geological repository seems to be the favored approach to storing nuclear waste. On January 26 2012 the Commission submitted its final report to Energy Secretary Steven Chu. The Commission put forth seven recommendations for developing a comprehensive strategy to pursue. A major recommendation was that "the United States should undertake an integrated nuclear waste management program that leads to the timely development of one or more permanent deep geological facilities for the safe disposal of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste". On January 26 2012 the Commission submitted its final report to Energy Secretary Steven Chu. In their final report the Commission put forth several recommendations for developing a comprehensive strategy to pursue. A major recommendation was that "the United States should undertake an integrated nuclear waste management program that leads to the timely development of one or more permanent deep geological facilities for the safe disposal of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste". There is an "international consensus on the advisability of storing nuclear waste in deep underground repositories" but no country in the world has yet opened such a site. In their final report the Commission put forth seven recommendations for developing a comprehensive strategy to pursue: Recommendation #1--The United States should undertake an integrated nuclear waste management program that leads to the timely development of one or more permanent deep geological facilities for the safe disposal of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste. Recommendation #2--A new single-purpose organization is needed to develop and implement a focused integrated program for the transportation storage and disposal of nuclear waste in the United States. Recommendation #3--Assured access to the balance in the Nuclear Waste Fund NWF and to the revenues generated by nuclear waste fee payments from utility ratepayers is absolutely essential and must be provided to the new nuclear waste management organization. Recommendation #4--A new approach is needed to site and develop nuclear waste facilities in the United States in the future. We believe that these processes are most likely to succeed if they are: · Adaptive-in the sense that process itself is flexible and produces decisions that are responsive to new information and new technical social or political developments. · Staged-in the sense that key decisions are revisited and modified as necessary along the way rather than being pre-determined in advance. · Consent-based-in the sense that affected communities have an opportunity to decide whether to accept facility siting decisions and retain significant local control. · Transparent-in the sense that all stakeholders have an opportunity to understand key decisions and engage in the process in a meaningful way. · Standards- and science-based-in the sense that the public can have confidence that all facilities meet rigorous objective and consistently-applied standards of safety and environmental protection. · Governed by partnership arrangements or legally-enforceable agreements with host states tribes and local communities. Recommendation #5--The current division of regulatory responsibilities for long-term repository performance between the NRC and the EPA is appropriate and should continue. The two agencies should develop new site-independent safety standards in a formally coordinated joint process that actively engages and solicits input from all the relevant constituencies. Recommendation #6--The roles responsibilities and authorities of local state and tribal governments with respect to facility siting and other aspects of nuclear waste disposal must be an element of the negotiation between the federal government and the other affected units of government in establishing a disposal facility. In addition to legally-binding agreements as discussed in Recommendation #4 all affected levels of government local state tribal etc. must have at a minimum a meaningful consultative role in all other important decisions. Additionally states and tribes should retain-or where appropriate be delegated-direct authority over aspects of regulation permitting and operations where oversight below the federal level can be exercised effectively and in a way that is helpful in protecting the interests and gaining the confidence of affected communities and citizens. Recommendation #7--The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board NWTRB should be retained as a valuable source of independent technical advice and review. Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future paperback
1992Atlantic-9780852987940Mech.Egg.P 1992. Hardcover. New. Mech.Egg.P hardcover
1992Atlantic-9780852987940Mech.Egg.P 1992. Hardcover. New. Mech.Egg.P hardcover
2000Star-9780727729583Ice Publishing 2000. Paperback. New. Ice Publishing paperback
2000Star-9780727729583Ice Publishing 2000. Paperback. New. Ice Publishing paperback
1996291467PN. New. 1996. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition . PN paperback
1992251645PN. New. 1992. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition . PN paperback
15-8636Berkeley CA: Californians For Nuclear Safeguards 1976. 8.5" x 14" Poster Two Tone Printing Very Good with minor loss some creasing scotch tape on corners. Berkeley, CA: Californians For Nuclear Safeguards, [1976?]. unknown
1992257075PN. New. 1992. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition . PN paperback
192146992London Taylor and Francis 1921. Blank wrapper. In: "The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science" Sixth Series Vol.42 No. 252 December 1921. Pp. 873-1024 textillustr. a. 1 plate. Entire issue offered. Chadwick & Bieler's paper: pp. 923-940 textillustr. <br/><br/><em>First printingof this milestone paper in which the strong nuclear forces are mentioned for the first time."It was only in 1921 that Chadwick had first shown that at very small distances the interactions of alpha particles with the atomic nucleus did not follow exactly the inverse square law predicted from the repulsion of their positive electrical scharges. Chadwick concluded that his experiments showed that these nuclear forces are of "very great intensity". According to Pais this is THE FIRST PUBLISHED STATEMENT ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF A STRONG NUCLEAR FORCE. This 'new force' interpretation was disputed untill well into 1920s."Hey & Walters."In any event Chadwick and Bieler's final conclusion avoid all reference to a possible electromagnetic cause for the deviations from the simple theory: "The present experiments do not seem to throw any light on the nature of the law of variation of the forces at the seat of an electric charge but merely show that the forces are of very great intensity. It is our task to find some field of force which will reproduce these effects." I consider this statement made in 1921 as marking the birth of the strong interaction."Pais in "Inward Bound" p. 240. </em> unknown
1977753687PN. New. 1977. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition. . PN paperback
1977755651PN. New. 1977. Soft Cover. Date is original print. This is a reprint edition. . PN paperback
1425100880.Gpaperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. paperback
1500208930.Gpaperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. paperback
1500615145.Gpaperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book. paperback
